Fedline

Federal Times Blogs

Postal board faces tough decision on five-day mail delivery

Bookmark and Share

The U.S. Postal Service’s board of governors is set to meet tomorrow, according to a spokesman, and a thorny choice will likely dominate the agenda: Let Postmaster General Pat Donahoe proceed with a previously announced plan to end Saturday mail delivery this August, with a projected savings of $2 billion annually. Or back off—at least for now—to avoid a probable lawsuit, not to mention antagonizing members of Congress whose help is needed to pass any long-haul fix for the Postal Service’s finances.

Among some observers, the betting is that the board will opt for door number two.

“That’s the strong rumor—that they’ve gone wobbly,” said Tony Conway, a former USPS executive who now runs the Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers and supports the reduced mail delivery schedule. At the Association for Postal Commerce, another private group that represents business mail users, President Gene Del Polito also expected a “back off” decision by the five-member board.

But George Gould, a consultant who formerly worked for the National Association of Letter Carriers, said the panel is divided on which way to go. When Donahoe announced the five-day delivery plan back in February, Gould said, part of the strategy was to draw lawmakers’ attention to the need for postal overhaul legislation.

The plan got their attention, Gould said, but not in a positive way. Thus far, no comprehensive postal bill has been introduced. But by another line of thinking, he said, sticking with the five-day plan would be a way to “keep the pressure” on lawmakers.

For what it’s worth, the Postal Service’s web site (as of this afternoon) still includes a section on the proposed changes. Although Saturday mail delivery would end in early August, package delivery would continue six days a week.  Like most board meetings, tomorrow’s will be closed to the public,  according to the USPS spokesman, Mark Saunders.

On one front, the episode underscores—yet again—how hard it can be for the Postal Service to wriggle around congressional fence lines. Since the 1980s, lawmakers have included a provision in annual spending legislation that prohibits the agency from ending six-day delivery. When Donahoe unveiled the plan in February, he entreated lawmakers to do nothing to stop it. Because the spending bill signed this month is mostly a continuation of last year’s legislation, however, it maintains the ban on delivery cutbacks even though the Postal Service is nowhere mentioned, according to staffers on both the House and Senate appropriations committees.

But as Conway noted, the Postal Service continues to pursue other cost-cutting measures. In a surprise move late last month, it decided to speed up dozens of mail processing plant closings and consolidations originally scheduled for next year.  A separate undertaking to cut hours at some 13,000 postal offices appears to be on track. And although a requirement to annually funnel about $5.5 billion into a fund for future retiree health care remains on the books, the Postal Service has twice defaulted with no outcry from Congress over violating the law. And in a symbolic milestone, the career postal workforce dropped below a half-million earlier this year.

As for that long awaited postal bill, Del Polito said he’s been told that it’s coming in about two weeks. Earlier this year, optimism officially abounded that a deal was within reach.
“I believe that we are very close,” Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., the ranking member on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said at a February congressional hearing, adding that a final agreement could come by the end of March. The committee’s chairman, Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., struck a similarly upbeat note. Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del., who heads the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, said he hoped to introduce a bill by the end of last month.

Not surprisingly, the job is taking a little longer.

“The need to enact comprehensive, bipartisan postal reform legislation is more urgent than ever,” Cummings said in a statement last week. “Although I am disappointed that more progress has not been made, I am hopeful that legislation can be enacted swiftly with concerted effort from all sides.” Issa spokesman Ali Ahmad declined comment on when a bill might be coming.

In the Senate, Carper will do what he can to bring Congress and the Obama administration together around “a set of meaningful reforms in the coming weeks to help the Postal Service survive and thrive,” spokeswoman Jennie Westbrook said in an email. To that end, she added, Carper “intends to have legislative language ready in the near future and remains hopeful that he will be able to move a bill in committee soon after.”

Tags: , , , ,

Comments

  1. Steve Says:
    April 8th, 2013 at 7:51 pm

    when will the postal service repay the 130,000 employees that were subjected to the illegal removal of injured emplyees by the USPS?

  2. Will Says:
    April 8th, 2013 at 7:53 pm

    Delivery frequency of first class letters and flats is up to congress to decide as this is an agency owed by the people. American can than vote based on the action congress takes. Not on the actions of someone who titled the job CEO as though it’s a private company.

  3. Jackie Says:
    April 8th, 2013 at 8:57 pm

    American need 7 days mail/parcel delivery…….

  4. James9001 Says:
    April 9th, 2013 at 1:17 am

    Hi there thanks alot for the post………..

    cheap flights to guayaquil

  5. TheRealFed Says:
    April 9th, 2013 at 4:31 am

    Benedict Arnold Gould.

  6. licketysplit Says:
    April 9th, 2013 at 6:44 am

    No reform coming. Prepare to abandon ship.

  7. Brian Greunke Says:
    April 9th, 2013 at 8:24 am

    What do you mean there is no legislation ready??? What about S. 316? H.R. 630? H.R.30? Give me a break!! The NALC has done everything it can to save the viability of the USPS and what thanks do they get?? Feet dragging from the clueless members of congress. Let us run like a business and get the hell out of the way, or make us non-profit like we were before 1972 and get a bailout……..we CANNOT have BOTH!!!!

  8. sammy Says:
    April 9th, 2013 at 10:17 pm

    You can’t run like a business and be unionized. That’s an oxymoron

Leave a Reply