Fedline

Federal Times Blogs

Number of empty chairs on Postal Service board increasing

Bookmark and Share

As the U.S. Postal Service’s problems grow, its governing board is shrinking.

The board, which is supposed to have 11 members, currently has eight and will lose another next week when Chairman Thurgood Marshall Jr. steps down, leaving it with just one more body than the six needed for a quorum to conduct business.

As of today, however, the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hasn’t scheduled  confirmation votes on three board nominations that have been awaiting action since summer. In an email, committee spokeswoman Leslie Phillips said she did not know the reason for the delay.

Although there have no recent meetings where the lack of a quorum has been an issue, “we look forward to having all the board vacancies filled and hope that happens as soon as possible,” USPS spokesman Dave Partenheimer said, also by email.

The increasing number of empty seats on what is officially known as the Board of Governors comes as the Postal Service is grappling with record financial losses and questions about its long-term direction as the Internet continues to drain away business. Besides nine presidentially appointed part-time members, the board includes Postmaster General Pat Donahoe and Deputy Postmaster General Ron Stroman. Among other jobs, the board sets postal policy, directs agency spending and decides top officers’ salaries.

“Certainly the Postal Service could benefit from the advice and wisdom of more members who bring a wide range of expertise,” Postal Regulatory Commission Chairman Ruth Goldway said in an interview. The mail carrier also needs “people of status” to take its concerns to Congress, she added.

The commission, which oversees the Postal Service, is facing its own personnel issues. The terms of two of its five members recently expired; while they can serve another year, the Obama administration has yet to either renominate them or name replacements, Goldway said. The White House did not respond to a request for comment.

Neither Marshall, a Washington lawyer, nor the incoming board chairman, Mickey Barnett, a former state legislator and lawyer from New Mexico, could be reached for comment. Because the panel usually meets in private, its influence is hard to assess.

But George Gould, a consultant and former lobbyist for the National Association of Letter Carriers, called the board’s makeup “a serious concern.” The Postal Service’s challenges are so great that the board “has become more directly involved in policy than it has in the past,” Gould said. “I think you need people who really understand the Postal Service, understand government, understand the employees.”

Under the law, board members are supposed to be chosen for their experience in public service, law, accounting or demonstrated management ability. They collect a base annual salary of $30,000, along with as much as $12,600 depending on the number of meetings each year. Their seven-year terms can be extended for another year in the absence of a replacement.

Of the three nominees whose appointments are awaiting Senate action, two are no strangers to the Postal Service. James Miller, who headed the Office of Management and Budget during part of the Reagan administration, was on the board from 2003 until last year; Katherine Tobin, a senior Education Department official earlier in the Obama administration, served from 2006 to 2009.

The new member, if confirmed, would be Stephen Crawford, a public policy professor at George Washington University who has written on postal issues. In an interview, Crawford attributed the nomination holdup to the press of other business and the fact that Congress has mostly been out of session since the Senate committee held a hearing on his nomination in July.

But with lawmakers now consumed with tax and spending conundrums, Crawford wasn’t counting on a final confirmation vote before the 112th Congress effectively goes out of business next month.

“There may just be too many other things competing with the limited time left.”

Tags: , , ,

Comments

  1. rich Says:
    November 30th, 2012 at 6:21 pm

    all board members should vbe retired mail carriers

  2. ET Wilken Says:
    December 2nd, 2012 at 10:27 am

    Well, I’m a current letter carrier with 8 years service, you can throw my name in the hat. I’d be happy to serve on the Board of Governors as a voice of reason and you don’t even have to call me Governor….

  3. richfield, mn Says:
    December 2nd, 2012 at 2:49 pm

    maybe replace pat donohoe, too. his “experience and expertise” is passe’. need new blood, new vision, accurate numbers; huge operation.

  4. Bryan J. Mulville Says:
    December 3rd, 2012 at 12:21 pm

    I, a retired manager and city letter carrier with 34+ years of service,with a great knowledge of postal issues,throw my hat into the ring.

  5. Mr. Icee Says:
    December 3rd, 2012 at 4:29 pm

    Mentioned above “Certainly the Postal Service could benefit from the advice and wisdom of more members who bring a wide range of expertise,” Postal Regulatory Commission Chairman Ruth Goldway said in an interview.

    The entire Work Force, the actual clerks, carriers, Mail Handlers, who do the ACTUAL work come from varied employment background prior to their working for the USPS. WE have a wide range of expertise. But management NEVER asks for our input. If they did, they would be pleasantly surprised with many GREAT IDEAS & SUGGESTIONS that could be implemented to turn things around for the GOOD of the service. Hey management, we are here and willing to give REAL WORLD suggestions.