Ask The Lawyer

By Debra Roth

Q & A Session – TS Security Clearance Question

Bookmark and Share

Ask the Lawyer received the following question (paraphrased for easier reading and clarity) from a reader on a legal matter that might be of interest to the entire audience.

Q:

I am a senior in college and I have lined up a job as a consultant for a firm working with government agencies. They want me to fill out a SF-86 for TS/SSBI. I have used marijuana a total of five times, the last time occurring two years ago. Two years ago, I also tried mushrooms once. Lastly, I have two underage drinking tickets from 2011. I haven’t used anything like that since the later part of 2011 as I decided that was not the lifestyle I wanted to live. I have also cut ties with everyone except in social situations.

I am excellent student and very active in the local community and on campus organizations.

Will I run into problems getting approved for my clearance? I will of course disclose all of this on my SF-86 and I have disclosed these incidents to my future employer.

A:

Your past raises questions that will be examined. You say all the right things, but your last usage may be too recent. An adjudication will make the final decision and it could go either way. 

Bill Bransford is managing partner of Shaw Bransford & Roth PC.

Disclaimer: Ask a Lawyer publishes information on this website for informational purposes only. Information on this website is intended – but not promised, guaranteed, or warranted – to reflect correct, complete and current developments. In addition, the contents of the website do not constitute legal advice and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the attorney. Information from this website is not intended to be used as a substitute for specific legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. You should not act, or refrain from acting, based on information on this website without seeking specific legal advice about your particular circumstances. No attorney-client relationship between you and Ask a Lawyer’s author is created by the transmission of information to or from this site.

Tags: ,

Comments

  1. grumpy Says:
    August 27th, 2013 at 1:09 pm

    By all means, this individual should include everything when filling out the SF-86. Omissions and being untruthful are real attention getters for investigators.

    Being completely honest, even if it means listing incriminating information is the best thing to do.

Leave a Reply

PLEASE NOTE! Do not submit ANY questions via the Comments form. Instead, please send your questions directly to lawyer@federaltimes.com. Questions submitted via the Comments form will NOT be answered!